Red flags for dealers in gold, art and luxury goods
High-value, portable goods can hold or move value outside the banking system, and prices are often subjective.
A red flag is a reason to look closer, not a finding. The duty is to report suspicion to the national financial intelligence unit, never to confront a customer. See reporting and suspicious activity. Which techniques belong under which industry is an editorial grouping; each indicator below is reproduced from the technique page that sources it.
What supervisors and standard-setters expect
Dealers in precious metals and stones sit in the FATF framework as a designated non-financial sector, and the FATF has published risk-based approach guidance written with the industry. It is non-binding, and the FATF page notes that it predates the 2025 revisions to Recommendation 1. The binding rules are national, and most key numbers turn on cash.
In the UK, a high value dealer is a firm that makes or receives cash payments of at least £10,000 in total for a transaction, including linked operations. Regulation 27 applies customer due diligence to dealers' cash transactions of £10,000 or more, and to art market participants' trades of works worth £10,000 or more; the sums were substituted on 30 June 2026. In the EU, Regulation 2024/1624 makes persons trading precious metals, stones, high-value goods and cultural goods (at €10,000 or more) obliged entities from 10 July 2027, caps cash payments in commercial dealings at €10,000 under Article 80, and requires at least basic identification for cash transactions of €3,000 or more unless a national limit applies. For these traders the supplier counts as a customer too. In the US, 31 CFR 1027.210 requires a written program built on a risk assessment that covers products, customers, suppliers, distribution channels, geography and transactions outside established customers or sources of supply, plus a compliance officer, training and independent testing.
Canada shows where the sector falls short. FINTRAC imposed $264,000 on Spence Diamonds on May 8, 2025, for five violations. The most serious was failing to file suspicious transaction reports despite indicators such as a client transacting at different locations or with different employees, an apparently altered or stolen payment card, and a client avoiding face-to-face dealing. FINTRAC also found incomplete policies, an undocumented client risk rating method, gaps in training, and no effectiveness review. The September 2026 FATF and APG evaluation of Canada concluded that supervision focused on higher-risk entities leaves dealers in precious metals and stones, and real estate, vulnerable.
For this page's red flags, the duty map is straightforward. Large cash for scrap or bullion from an unexplained source engages the cash thresholds and the aggregation of linked payments. Buyers acting through shells or paying through third parties engage beneficial ownership and the identity of who is really paying. Suppliers who cannot show where metal came from engage the supplier-as-customer rule and the US requirement to risk-assess transactions outside established sources of supply. Turnover out of line with size is what monitoring and suspicious transaction reporting exist to catch.
As of October 2026: Checked October 21, 2026. UK thresholds were re-set by S.I. 2026/621 on 30 June 2026 and the page does not show the earlier figures. The EU rules are not yet in application. The FATF's own cash threshold for these dealers could not be confirmed from an FATF page that opened, so it is not stated here. The US dealer definition and its $50,000 purchase test were read but not repeated. The Spence Diamonds penalty is closed; other FINTRAC jewellery penalties are under Federal Court appeal and may change.
Red flags by technique
Gold and precious metals
- Large cash payments for scrap gold or bullion from customers who cannot explain their source
- Suppliers who call themselves gold collectors and cannot say where the metal was mined
- Gold arriving from countries whose own production could not supply that volume
- Rotating front companies, or shippers and manufacturers on customs forms who do not match the real seller
- Invoices and shipments that do not match, such as gold grain sold under paperwork describing something else
- A business whose gold turnover, and cash deposits, far exceed its size or history
Art, antiques and luxury goods
- A buyer who shows little interest in the work itself, its condition, or its price
- Purchases made through shell companies, trusts, or advisors who will not name the real client
- Large payments from third parties, from unrelated companies, or from high-risk jurisdictions
- Shipping invoices or customs values far below a work's real worth
- Works bought and quickly resold, often at prices that make no market sense
- Pieces held in storage for years and never displayed, then used as collateral or gifted between related parties
Prepaid cards and gift cards
- Bulk purchases of prepaid or gift cards with cash or other illicit funds, or people recruited to buy or carry cards for someone else
- Multiple cards bought under aliases, or funded with stolen credit or debit card details
- Two or more cards linked to one account, with funds loaded in one country and withdrawn in another
- Cards used to buy money orders, merchandise, or other prepaid cards, which are then resold for cash
- A retailer or account with gift card redemptions or resales that are far out of line with its normal business
- Elderly or vulnerable customers buying large numbers of cards while on the phone, then reading out the codes (a sign of an active scam, and the start of the laundering chain)
Sources
- FATF Guidance on the Risk-Based Approach for Dealers in Precious Metals and Stones (Financial Action Task Force, Undated on the FATF page; predates the 2025 Recommendation 1 revisions).
- The Money Laundering Regulations 2017, regulation 27 (when customer due diligence must be applied) (UK Government (legislation.gov.uk), Revised text current to October 2026).
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1624, Articles 3, 19 and 80 (European Union (EUR-Lex), May 31, 2024).
- 31 CFR 1027.210, Anti-money laundering programs for dealers in precious metals, precious stones, or jewels (US Department of the Treasury (FinCEN), via Cornell LII, Current text, read October 2026).
- Notice of administrative monetary penalty: Spence Diamonds Ltd. (FINTRAC, September 23, 2025).
- FATF/APG Mutual Evaluation Report of Canada 2026 (Financial Action Task Force / Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering, September 29, 2026).